{"id":108097,"date":"2025-07-08T11:50:32","date_gmt":"2025-07-08T11:50:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.globalbrandsmagazine.com\/?p=107395"},"modified":"2025-07-08T11:50:32","modified_gmt":"2025-07-08T11:50:32","slug":"marko-glisic-reveals-5-components-in-internal-audits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.globalbrandsmagazine.com\/gbmstaging\/marko-glisic-reveals-5-components-in-internal-audits\/","title":{"rendered":"Marko Glisic Reveals 5 Components in Internal Audits Worth $2M in Savings"},"content":{"rendered":"
A single misaligned inventory count triggered a cascade of compliance failures that cost a California cannabis company $872,640 annually in unaccounted discrepancies. When Marko Glisic, CPA and Partner at GreenGrowth CPAs, implemented his specialized internal audit framework, the company eliminated these losses entirely within six months. The systematic approach has collectively saved startups<\/a> over $2 million in compliance costs across multiple organizations.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n According to recent compliance statistics, non-compliance costs businesses an average of $4,005,116 in revenue losses, while maintaining compliance costs less than half that amount. For resource-constrained startups navigating complex regulatory environments, efficient compliance systems often determine the difference between survival and failure.<\/span><\/p>\n Marko Glisic spent eight years at Deloitte & Touche LLP, rising to Senior Manager, where he directed audits for multi-billion dollar enterprises, including a major food company’s $4 billion revenue audit with teams spanning Costa Rica, Germany, and Thailand. The <\/span>entrepreneur’s professional journey<\/span><\/a> from Big Four accounting to cannabis industry leadership demonstrates expertise in managing 12,000-hour annual audit budgets and scalable control systems.<\/span><\/p>\n “When I was at Deloitte, I realized the importance of building systems and structures and good processes,” Glisic explains. “That’s something with GreenGrowth we started early on \u2013 really to build that strong foundation and then off of that continue growing and expanding.”<\/span><\/p>\n The transition from Fortune 500 audits to startup compliance revealed a critical gap. While large corporations possessed robust frameworks backed by substantial resources, startups struggled with expensive, inefficient compliance processes. Research from Globalscape and the Ponemon Institute identified that regular compliance audits saved businesses $2.86 million on average, while centralized data governance programs saved $3.01 million.<\/span><\/p>\n The internal audit<\/a> framework diverges from traditional approaches through its emphasis on preventive controls rather than reactive measures. Five interconnected components address the unique challenges startups face:<\/span><\/p>\n The cannabis industry’s cash-based operations provided the ultimate testing ground for robust financial controls. “We set up a process for filing Form 8300 for $10,000 in cash taken in, thus reducing the risk of penalties that can add up to $3,000,000,” Glisic notes. The proactive approach transforms potential liabilities into systematic processes.<\/span><\/p>\n One client faced $872,640 in annual unaccounted inventory discrepancies before implementation. “We set up controls around inventory purchasing, intake\/receiving, cycle counts, and sales, resulting in no inventory discrepancies,” Glisic explains. The framework includes three-way matching for purchases, regular cycle counts, and automated variance reporting.<\/span><\/p>\n The framework provides startups with pre-built templates covering everything from fixed asset rollforward schedules to equity tracking systems. These templates, distributed freely to hundreds of founders, eliminate expensive consultants during early growth stages while reducing audit preparation time by up to 70%.<\/span><\/p>\n The methodology prioritizes audit efforts based on quantified risk assessments, focusing on intensive reviews on areas with the highest potential for material misstatements. Modern compliance automation software continuously monitors tech stacks for nonconformities, ensuring organizations never fall out of compliance.<\/span><\/p>\n Rather than relying on annual audits, the framework implements ongoing monitoring systems that flag anomalies in real-time. Traditional annual reviews fail to keep pace with operational changes at rapidly scaling startups, making continuous auditing particularly valuable.<\/span><\/p>\n The framework’s effectiveness becomes clear through specific implementations. A vertically integrated cannabis operator leveraged the audit systems to grow from $4 million in revenue with negative EBITDA to $50 million in revenue with 25% EBITDA margins, culminating in a successful $60 million exit.<\/span><\/p>\n Another implementation resolved $1,148,320 in cash discrepancies at a California dispensary through systematic control implementation. “We identified $1,250,000 in add-backs to EBITDA, which at a 5x multiple resulted in $6,250,000 in added value,” Glisic reports from another engagement.<\/span><\/p>\n The financial services industry faces average compliance expenses reaching $30.9 million annually. While startups operate at smaller scales, the proportional burden often proves even more challenging given limited resources. Cannabis businesses face unique valuation challenges that make efficient compliance frameworks particularly valuable.<\/span><\/p>\n The framework generates savings through three primary mechanisms:<\/span><\/p>\n Prevention of Costly Compliance Failures<\/b> Business disruption constitutes the most costly consequence of non-compliance, with businesses losing $5,107,206 on average. Implementing robust controls from inception helps startups avoid these catastrophic losses.<\/span><\/p>\n Reduction of Ongoing Compliance Costs<\/b> SOC 2 compliance requires organizations to have internal audit teams conducting regular audits. The templates and automated monitoring tools minimize personnel requirements for maintaining compliance through automation and standardization.<\/span><\/p>\n Optimization for External Audits<\/b> Companies implementing the full framework typically reduce external audit fees by 30-40% due to superior documentation and control evidence, positioning startups advantageously for both audits and investor due diligence.<\/span><\/p>\n The framework addresses a fundamental challenge: translating enterprise-level control concepts into startup-appropriate implementations. Fortune 500 companies typically deploy extensive internal audit teams, but startups require lightweight yet effective alternatives.<\/span><\/p>\n “You have to build your business<\/a> as a business, not as a job,” Glisic states. This principle shapes the framework’s design, enabling founders to implement institutional-quality controls without institutional overhead. The ongoing cannabis rescheduling discussion illustrates how regulatory changes create both opportunities and compliance challenges.<\/span><\/p>\nFrom Big Four Excellence to Startup Innovation<\/b><\/h2>\n
The Five Framework Components<\/b><\/h2>\n
1. Cash Control Architecture<\/b><\/h3>\n
2. Inventory Management Systems<\/b><\/h3>\n
3. Documentation Standardization<\/b><\/h3>\n
4. Risk-Based Internal Audit Approach<\/b><\/h3>\n
5. Continuous Monitoring Protocols<\/b><\/h3>\n
Real-World Impact<\/b><\/h2>\n
Cost Savings Through Preventive Compliance<\/b><\/h2>\n
Adapting Enterprise Controls for Startups<\/b><\/h2>\n
The Future of Compliance<\/b><\/h2>\n